Tired of our media’s witch-hunts, and their political favouritism?

Election year – and we’re ill-served by partisan media – like Fairfax. Given their love affair with the National Party, when do they ever comment, for example, on the fact that good old Bill English, following on from good old John Key, and so often the mouthpiece for his boss when it came to making unpopular statements, admitted that “the government may beef up the Overseas Investment Office to make it quicker for foreigners to get permission to buy New Zealand assets.” ** As for their hate affair with Donald Trump, when do we ever get analysis as good as this? https://thefederalist.com/2017/06/07/james-comeys-latest-statement-is-an-indictment-of-comey-not-trump/

and https://spectator.org/prosecute-comey/

Not from the talking heads of our second-rate media,  who for weeks now have been obsessed with peddling whatever anti-Trump venom they can gleefully get hold of. And their cartoonists defy convention by their sheer nastiness…rather than insightfulness.

When our journalist deify themselves as Seekers after Truth and Justice, it’s always rather amusing. As far back as November 2016, senior media individuals, editors, deputy editors, etc. of our dailies, particularly of Fairfax, signed a full-page advertisement in national newspapers. They were vigorously arguing that the Commerce Commission’s decision to refuse a merger of Fairfax media and NZME (New Zealand Media and Entertainment…although they didn’t bother to explain this) was wrong. Congratulating themselves on having 30 editors signing their names to this open letter, they castigated the Commerce Commission for not sticking to “the economic analysis” but straying “into intangibles such as the quality of journalism, and unquantified risks to editorial independence.” Hmm.

In appealing to the general public they would have been wiser not to boast too much about the quality of journalism in this country, pretty awful at best in daily newspapers (and this is even when ignoring gratuitous mistakes in grammar and syntax).  No suggestion of balance is evident in relation to issues such as the near hysteria over supposed man-made global warming (even though well-established science journals are now back-peddling on this extraordinary, politicised phenomenon, and some well-regarded scientists are saying we are on the brink of another mini-ice-age. http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/611111/Former-government-expert-disproves-climate-change-and-says-world-will-soon-cool-down

However, editorial bias – and gullibility – has become so flagrantly obvious, with these dissenting voices suppressed in our mainstream media.  Moreover, lack of any objectivity in most editorials (unsigned, of course, although this luxury is not given to correspondents) is matched by the widespread knowledge that many letters to the editor are now suppressed simply because they annoy the letters editor, who doesn’t agree…so doesn’t want them to see the light of day. So much for fair debate.

It’s not just the extraordinary venom of the anti-Trump phenomenon fanned by the virulent rhetoric of the Left, and financially supported by Clinton supporters. Shockingly the latter are attempting to overthrow a legitimate change of Government in the USA – the verdict of the American people at election time – by unconstitutional means – by the misinterpretation and fabrication of facts – and even by the not so covert encouragement of violence.

For weeks now my own local Fairfax daily has published quite appallingly slanted  editorials buying into every anti-Trump denouément  – without making any attempt to provide their  dismantling – readily available by first-class investigative journalists abroad – but not, of course, any in this country. The Washington Post  has long been infamous for its unacceptable bias and its peddling of leaked and quite wrong information, no doubt on the premise that if enough lies are told they’ll eventually achieve what the Post so badly wants – the indictment of a president, regardless of the fact that that thoroughly dreadful pair, the Clintons (read Nobody Left to Lie To, by Christopher Hitchens, himself a Democrat who simply couldn’t defend the  widespread corruption that surrounded Bill Clinton’s presidency – let along Hillary’s lies).

Top overseas commentators now argue with good reason that if truth and justice prevailed, Hillary Clinton would now be behind bars. She was an inferior candidate who deservedly lost an election – but the darling of The Beautiful People, the Hollywood actors – whoops – Stars! –  media sycophants  and pop music celebrities never slow to advance their superior opinions. Every socially and morally destabilising issue pushed by the bullies of the Left has found a listening in Hillary (as with Obama) – whether supporting the horror of “partial birth” abortions (removing the brain from a baby emerging into the world”… or whether the new fashion for identifying oneself as transgender on the basis of arguing that identity choice beats natural biology. In the name of “tolerance”, the bully boys and girls on the Left demand that those in conscience opposing these and other new and destructive social practices must be punished, silenced, or hauled before the courts for “discrimination”.

In its obsession with Trump, no doubt  making mistakes along the way, but apparently determined in principle to respect his reform programme of returning respect for the forgotten people of America, blue collar workers and families, our media let us down. Those targeted by the” liberal Left” even include Christians,  now demonised by the media (though it has been Christian values which  have underpinned and stabilized our democracy).  Their extreme partisanship shown towards our former PM – the glib and slippery John Key, for example – contrasts with the bile heaped upon New Zealand First leader Winston Peters, which has been quite blatant. Yet Peters speaks more than any other politician for backbone New Zealanders.

Returning to the signed letter to the Commerce Commission, we can only shake our heads when we read, “ensuring that a diversity of views, perspectives, experiences and issues are covered is an editor’s most fundamental task.”

There’s more:  “…we have never been swayed by political or commercial influence.’’ And, to the Commission, “You say that it is important that members of society – government, corporate and private citizens – are not able to influence one provider with the opportunities for differing views to be expressed.  We agree, and as gatekeepers as of many of the most august newsrooms and publications in the country would never let that happen.”

Oh no. Dearie me… August? And it reads as if they actually believe it.

 Let’s remember that they said this, that they actually put it this into writing. And it let’s insist that from now onwards they translate their flowery rhetoric into actual practice. Starting with examining the phenomenon of hate being deliberately fanned against Trump in the US, and in this country and sheeting it home to where it belongs,  would be a belated start. Just some effort, at least,  to provide objectivity on crucial issues would make a nice change.

**http://www.investigatemagazine.co.nz/Investigate/17341/amy-brooke-downplaying-the-very-real-threats-to-nz/?mc_cid=e632cab3ff&mc_eid=2eadea2444

**And for the important stories which are so relevant in election year,  check out

http://www.investigatemagazine.co.nz/Investigate/

Help us fight for the 100 Days – Claiming Back New Zealand movement!

© Amy Brooke, Convener. See my book “100 Days – Claiming Back New Zealand …what has gone wrong, and how we can control our politicians.” Available through www.amybrooke.co.nz, Kindle, or HATM Publishers.

It helps a lot to SHARE or LIKE us through the social media network!
Do help us to get our message further out by donating. See www.100days.co.nz!

 

 

The slippery path to racial separatism

Hello everybody, helping to claim back New Zealand…

The growing push towards racial separatism in this country is deplored by most New Zealanders – including those with partial Maori ancestry who do not benefit in the slightest from what now corporatised iwi continually pressure government to contrive – advantages for themselves only.

The former principle of equal rights and protection for all – in a genuine democracy – regardless of colour, race, gender or creed, has never been bettered. But our vote-buying government is steadily selling us out – and damaging social relationships – as well as our economy.

The Maori economy is now worth over $40 billion – courtesy of taxpayers’ pockets – (very little of which has reached any but powerful iwi ) – as a result of treaty settlements which were intended to help those genuinely disadvantaged. Instead, pseudo-tribes which actually manage to avoid paying any tax at all are constantly chasing even more money and power – and flexing their muscles. Pressure is being put not only on local government organisations for undemocratic, special representation – but universities and other institutions are giving way to moneyed iwi pressure to demand that scholarships be directed preferentially towards supposed Maori benefit – or given only to Maori – and that students be required to demonstrate “cultural sensitivity” before they are allowed to graduate!

These are quite shocking examples of cultural bullying – with complete disregard for the “cultural sensitivity” of all others – those who want their own very real values – their wish for a genuine democracy – to be prioritised.

The petition below deserves all our support. And we need to recognise, as individuals, that it is up to each of us to help claim back this country – and to object to our government, our political parties, our own MPs – about this growing apartheid – which it basically is. Apart from signing below, we can text or call our own MPs, our local body councillors, Ministers, the PM or write to our local newspapers – to object to these damaging policies. Or we can do nothing…

https://www.change.org/p/prime-minister-abolish-auckland-council-s-maori-statutory-board

Help us fight for the 100 Days – Claiming Back New Zealand movement!

© Amy Brooke, Convener. See my book “100 Days – Claiming Back New Zealand …what has gone wrong, and how we can control our politicians.” Available through Kindle, or HATM Publishers.

It helps a lot to SHARE or LIKE us through the social media network!
Do help us to get our message further out by donating. See www.100days.co.nz!

Recycling Bill English? Or we, the people…?

Are our supposedly superior, wise politicians costing us too much?

Should we keep regarding them as born to be in charge of us all? Or, lest we forget… is it time we grew up, as a people?

New Zealanders have understandably lost confidence in our politicians – not only to actually listen to New Zealanders – which they demonstrably don’t – but to even be competent.  Too many government policies no longer favour the public good. So we are joining other Western countries no longer impressed by being governed by political classes paying far too little attention to putting the interests of their own citizens first, and with far too much unwarranted confidence in their own decision-making.  Something so often happens to very ordinary people once they become politicians – and the public here – as in England and elsewhere  –  heartened by  Brexit’s stunning win,  is now questioning how our political system works, and how we can rein in our born-to-rule politicians. And yes – we do have a practicable solution within reach – The 100 Days  – see www.100days.co.nz . Or are we happy to still be led by the nose…?

In a recent massive throw-out from my study, I came across an old reply to me from Bill English.  I can’t say I’m surprised at its evasiveness, though, to be fair, it was written in 2002 – 15 years ago  – and found again only now. And certainly, people do grow up intellectually. However it’s well said that anyone can become a Prime Minister – as John Key, a supremely ambitious money trader proved – arguably causing a great deal of damage to the country – damage that that would horrify our parents and grandparents who fought in more than two World Wars, so many servicemen and women giving their lives to preserve New Zealand – and a freedom and way of life now fast being lost to us.

So what of our present Prime Minister, whose reply to me came when I wrote, finding (as with others) it almost incredible what he said when comparing one of the  Lord of the Rings films to Tolkien’s masterpiece. What he stated was that his “preference” was for the film. But, hmm,  well no – he hadn’t actually read the books. 

So how could there be any preference there? It won’t be lost on the reader that one can’t compare one thing to another …unless one is familiar with both.

But then, when did the reality that facts don’t line up ever bother a politician?  When also queried about his use of the word “elitist” in apparently a pejorative sense, a comment which might well raise doubts about whether he thought Tolkien’s books too high-powered intellectually to be accessible to the ordinary reader (or to him?)  – and reminded that bright children down at intermediate school level were reading them) –  he pulled a metaphorical rabbit from a hat.  With the kind of double-speak in which politicians excel, he replied, “The film is now definitive of the book – people will see Jackson’s Ents, (sic) Helms Deep is now Jackson’s Deep”.

Well no – it isn’t and his “definitive” means basically nothing. Moreover, as an English graduate,  our now Prime Minister should have been well aware that the printed word can convey nuances and subtleties which the visual version of a story cannot match. The omission of Tom Bombadil, for example, who represented important things central to the story (as Tolkien himself noted) but was left out of the film, was a disappointment to many readers of the trilogy.  In fact, any criticisms of Jackson’s film centres on his lack of much-needed editing, as well as his somewhat ham-fisted approach in areas that required more understatement. Even Weta Workshop’s brilliance was not enough to excuse the tedious, repetitious close-ups of the ugliness of the Orcs – and the loveliness of the land of the Elves was not successfully conveyed. Jackson does a better job with horror, than its opposite.

We’re accustomed to say that people are entitled to their opinion. But what sort of opinion rests upon no foundation?  Our present PM’s preference for a film -compared to a book which he had never read – is of course no preference at all. Ah, but politicians can bluster – as in his reply, when he added that,  “- well there are lots of books more challenging than Lord of the Rings.” But then, again, if he hadn’t actually read The Rings trilogy…to what “more challenging” books would he be capable of comparing it?

Coming again upon this correspondence, it struck me how far what the Irish call “the gift of the gab” can carry a politician. Add it to an ability to exude charisma – and a country is in danger. It has happened right throughout history and we never seem to learn from it, and to question why we are so foolish as to keep paying lip service to the notion that “leadership” is more important than the knowledge that any real democracy depends upon the genuine participation of so-called ordinary men and women, conducting their own lives, prioritising their families – but with a close eye on what their politicians are up to.

Yet we are aware that  the cult of leadership which grows around determined individuals has led to the greatest bloodbaths of all  –  and the  siren call of  highly destructive individuals  – the Hitlers, Stalins, Pol Pots, today’s  Kim Jong–un and so on whose indifference to what happens to their own people, sacrificed to their  leader’s ambitions,  should be a lesson to us. Wars in which scores of millions die pointlessly and needlessly are a twisted tribute to the danger of that concept of the importance of leadership which we are always being asked to defer to. And as a well-respected British journalist, under the pseudonym of Alpha of the Plough pointed out, “There is a large part of the public …which will believe anything because it hasn’t the faculty of judging anything but the size of the crowd, and will always follow the ass with the longest ears and the loudest bray.”

If it strikes some readers that this is a very apt description not only of some of our recent leaders –  but also now of the mainstream media, playing follow-the leader not only in their admiration for our recently departed  and disastrously charismatic Prime Minister –  very few of us would disagree. The now predominantly left-wing media have their favourite politicians, and coat-tail one another’s thinking with regard to the mis-called” liberal” and “progressive” issues of the day. Our mainstream commentators’ over-confident pronouncements have become inimical to quality thinking. Editors now routinely suppress letters from correspondents with whom they disagree. Nor is it a healthy sign that comments in response to unsigned editorialists and opinion-writers in some major New Zealand newspapers on-line have now been discontinued. In this respect, the NBR (National Business Review) deserves readers’ support for its healthy promotion of vigorous debate and feedback.

However, that silent majority which the politicians still fear, anxious lest they begin to realise their real power, can take heart. An excellent new monthly, Your Voice, edited by Mykeljon Winkel, available online or as  a print subscription, is doing a brilliant job of tackling some of the quite blatant untruths now being peddled in relation to the Treaty of Waitangi…as well as examining other relevant issues of today. It can be found at www.newzealand voice.co.nz. And although an interview with Judith Collins contains a politician’s very typical equivocations and evasiveness in response to direct questions put to her, there are interesting and relevant pieces throughout.  An article by John Ansell, in particular, in the February issue – not Race, Not Gender, Just New Zealander… The Reason for the Existence of the Treaty presents admirably concisely the reason that the Maori chiefs at the time had every good reason to welcome the treaty – and well understood that they were yielding sovereignty to the British Queen.

Other excellent articles in relation to our nation’s history throw more light on the truth of Maori European interaction than today’s media bother to attempt. The March edition includes Bruce Moon’s We Have Just One True History (“And so we come to the Rangiowhia affray, about which probably more flagrant lies have been touted than any event in our history”. Moon’s rigorous research reminds me of Alan Everton’s former excellent dismantling of  Ngai Tahu’s prevarications and the utter distortions, let alone falsehoods which it so successfully employed to squeeze a  third “full and final” settlement for this corporatised pseudo-iwi – one which, on the actual evidence, Parliament should never have awarded.

 But today, as we all know, too bad about actual evidence: it doesn’t count. Today’s deliberate muddying of the waters around treaty issues has basically been for the purpose of allowing conniving iwi on the make, (by no means representing the majority of part-Maori)  to gain more and more economic and totally undemocratic political advantage. And of course of there is always the much loved-microphone – or the newspaper headline , those sops to vanity and hubris obediently supplied by our compliant media, always keen to stir the pot…but not so keen to allow that very necessary debate which helps to arrive at the truth of issues. Yet we are well aware that, in a democracy, exclusive rights proposed in law, intended to be bestowed on any racial group, are simply untenable…and basically unconstitutional. This hasn’t stopped National from ignoring the wishes of the majority of us. Such a party has become a danger to the country and for this reason, David Rankin’s petition, in Change Org, deserves all our support.  https://www.change.org/p/prime-minister-abolish-auckland-council-s-maori-statutory-board?recruiter=694585883&utm_source=share_for_starters&utm_medium=copyLink

In a country like New Zealand we have had democratic safeguards to protect us (to some extent only) from the supremely ambitious individuals always there in our political cliques, some with honourable motives – others convinced that we must be inveigled into subscribing to the ideology to which they are wedded – as with the socialist Helen Clarks’ One World Government – and John Key’s attempt to remove the Union Jack from our flag.

The latter of course was line with the wishes of wealthy Communist Chinese working behind-the-scenes to facilitate this, And what of Key’s neglect of so much that badly needs addressing in this country, denying even the unprecedented housing crisis which now has so many New Zealanders impoverished, living in cars, in garages, on the streets? Bill English also showed himself totally ineffectual here…The damage caused by virtually unrestricted immigration, used to create the illusion of economic buoyancy…the sell-out of this country, our productive farms and businesses to Communist Chinese interests  – and the flogging off of our high country sheep stations  to the super-wealthy Americans and others seeking a bolthole – all of whom can buy out New Zealanders’ rights to our own land, our remaining productive industries, our housing stock? These are the legacy of our recent leaders, and the yes-men and-women who surround them in parliament. Sycophancy rules.

In all these destructive policies, at least publicly, our present Prime Minister, Bill English, has been complicit. How much can we rely upon his ability – a consummate yes-man, as John Key’s lieutenant, to face up honestly to what has happened to this country?  Most of us wouldn’t bet on it.  So why ever would we vote for him to be our new Prime Minister? And when the media kept boasting about Key, with his 30% or thereabouts rating as Prime Minister being so very popular, they were guilty of the fact that, looking objectively at the figures, we know that two thirds of the country did not want him there.  60 to 70% did not rate him. But in the eyes of a largely infatuated commentariat, subject to his switched-on charm and smarm; given special interviews; beaming eye contact; flattered by his attention: recipients of bottles of wine, Key could do little wrong – just as Trump can do no right. The lesson from Brexit has apparently been totally lost on our own media circles.

Can we now be called the Stupid Country? What of the then Finance Minister Bill English’s failure in our supposedly representative democracy, to actually represent the wishes of the country when polling made plain New Zealanders opposition to the potentially damaging TPP deal? Where is the actual evidence that he ever stood up to the seemingly folksy but basically autocratic John Key? Compared to other countries – even Australia, for example the ruling National party’s failure to acknowledge this – let alone to acknowledge the housing market disgrace was because if John Key didn’t want to, neither did any of the Nats. No Sir…

Why then of the theory of the wisdom of the crowds – rather than the conclusions of a select few? The ruling National government has apparently been unable to acknowledge the pitfalls in the TPP which have been very plain to the reasonable onlooker. The determination of government to ignore public opinion has perhaps been a tipping point to us all. Perhaps we are beginning to grow up as a people- in the same way as the English have , at last, reclaimed their country from its  EU stranglehold.  And we in this small country have been equally guilty of allowing to be forced on us every failed doctrine that has already caused so much damage in the UK.

Nowhere has the damage caused by obdurate politicians, convinced of their superior thinking and leadership skills, been more evident than recently, across all Europe . What we can fairly call the sheer stupidity of politicians like Angela Merkel –   far too late rethinking her arrogant, authoritarian rulings which have plunged Germany into such disarray  – needs to be recognised for what it was. Europe is now overrun by far more refugees than can be successfully assimilated   –  and among these Isis terrorists have been successfully smuggled in.  Merkel’s virtual bullying of other countries, wherever a Muslim population has now established a considerable and divisive presence, has lead there also to growing social destabilisation, violence and crime, the ill-treatment and raping of women, and mounting welfare bills. Even England is in trouble. https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10190/islam-england-france

Diversity, multiculturalism – all the much-touted clichés have now been shown to be quite wrong directions for any country to move in.  The much maligned Enoch Powell’s warning in the 60s that mass immigration would preclude assimilation, and that such a large volume of foreign nationals inevitably concentrated in major cities would lead to ghettoisation, and Balkanisation, was genuinely prophetic, as Michael Davies points out in a recent Australian Spectator. It was the know-best politicians who pilloried him – aided by an always cooperative mass media. Again, it was so-called ordinary people who also warned against Britain yielding its independence and judicial separateness in important areas of national decision-making – such as allowing the judiciary to become subservient to the rulings of Brussels. So very few politicians,  with notable exceptions such as Powell and Margaret Thatcher, (who, loving their own country and its traditions “understood why immigrants would be reluctant to completely abandon theirs) foresaw what lay ahead.

And we in this country are now having to put up with the same sort of ill-thought nonsense emphasising “diversity” – i.e. the lack of assimilation, allowing in those large numbers of immigrants which too often lead to the clash of cultures, the attack on the stabilising values of the home country, the clamour for an undemocratic separateness, and the displacement, today, of our own people in the job market and housing. This, apart even from that fact we are losing our most productive farmland to the rapacious Communist Chinese’s self-serving interests – and the best of our high country sheep stations to those others plum-picking land now priced well beyond the reach of New Zealanders ourselves.

Every now and again we get trotted out Thomas Carlyle’s objection to democracy: as classicist Peter Jones recounts in the Spectator article Enemies of the People. “I do not believe in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance”. In other words, infinitely wise politician should tell the ignorant mob what to think, not vice versa.

What when we can say, with very good reason, that we do not believe in the collective wisdom of ignorant or self-serving politicians, led by the nose too often by vested interest groups  – and/or letting us down by their simple inability to devote time to the thorough research needed to establish the truth of issues?

Athenians invented direct democracy in 508BC, lasting until 323 BC, which handed to the “demos”, citizens in the assembly, the power to decide on policy. Objections were raised from the beginning by those who thought their thinking was superior… Plato thought a state could be well governed only by Platonic philosophers. Aristotle thought that monarchy would be the best of all – Catch-22 – if only someone of the required standard could be found. On went the objections, until as Jones points out, it was Plutarch, “a prolific Greek writer of the second century A.D. with a great admiration for Roman stability “– (a stability which the reader will recall didn’t last for very long after all ) … “who really put the boot in, describing the public as “animals… unreasoning, unruly volatile and degenerate”. Interestingly this description will strike the reader as fairly closely summing up our own politicians’ behaviour in the debating chamber. However, as “Plutarch dominated discussions in the West about the best form of government from the 16th till the 19th century, his idea that rule by the demos could be nothing but mob rule became the knee-jerk position, and still is.  Animals, obviously.”

Make no mistake – our politicians love to think this.  (Remember Helen Clark’s “feral” and “inbreds”?  And Hilary Clinton’s “A basket of deplorables.”)

But they’ve been proved wrong by the most free, successful,  and democratic country in the world – Switzerland. And there is absolutely no reason why we New Zealanders can’t turn our own minds to insist that we follow a system which really works – in contrast to the mess our political parties have made to our own country – where the pace is accelerating to destroy of so much of what we have left.

Peter Jones concludes, “In the howls about mob rule,  however, Switzerland, virtually a direct democracy for some 600 years, somehow never features.” Switzerland did even better than this – not content with being virtually a direct democracy, the Swiss people themselves decided they had had enough of being over-ruled by damaging leaders. Their brilliant solution was to fight for the 100 Days provision. They won this right about 160 years ago. It ensures any legislation passed by Parliament, no matter by what political party or by whatever coalition is currently in power in the country… every piece of legislation must wait for 100 Days before it can come into force. The Swiss people can themselves then decide whether or not they agree,  or whether they want to challenge it.

If the latter, before the end of the 100 Days period, if as few as 50,000 people (in a country double our population, call for a vote  – in New Zealand it would be proportionately about 26,000 ) then that’s enough. A vote is held – it’s called the Facultative Referendum, and whatever the people say is binding on the government.

So successful has this been that Swiss politicians are merely part-time. Meeting one day  only a week, they can hold down other jobs… as lawyers, teachers, doctors, housewives, tradesmen… and their Parliament needs to meet only four times a year. No Helen Clark or Bill English or John Key can dig in, clinging to virtually supreme power and dominating the ruling party. The Swiss make sure of this by allowing the President to stay in office for one year only. Their seven-only member cabinet, simply take turns to be President. It works very well.

 Why can’t we now fight for the same? Well, we can, and should. It is the best possible system to secure a real democracy. And to all the Big Names anxious to tell us it wouldn’t work, we can say – This is nonsense – it does. In fact it is working better than any other political system today.

As the last thing that politicians want is to lose their power, and we can count on a now thoroughly dumbed-down, but highly opiniated media to rubbish any concept that doesn’t send power to their left-wing cohorts, it is up to us, the real New Zealanders, remembering the hard work and sacrifices our own people have made for four generations, to do our own bit.

How? Email your MP. Mail the Prime Minister, the leader and members of the Opposition, the leaders of all the political parties, and ask them whether or not they are willing to hand back the decision-making to the people of New Zealand. Call your MPs….They will be very polite to you in election year…

This is a real test of whether or not our politicians believe in a democracy. But we know they don’t want a democracy – they want to rule us – and are now busy making all those hasty promises routinely made in election-year,  promising the reforms so conveniently held until then.

There are so many ways you can help. Tell others…You can send on to as many as you can the fact of our 100 days campaign…both on Facebook, and on- site – See 100 Days – Claiming back New Zealand www.100days.co.nz  You can write letters to the paper. You can complain to the Press Council if the editor keeps rejecting them…You can talk about it on Talkback.  You can join us – support us, even a little financially, if you can.

 It means at least a little effort – not much time in busy people’s lives. But as we all have a moral responsibility, which reaches beyond us and our families towards the community, and towards our country, safeguarding what our parents and grandparents, uncles and aunts fought  and gave their lives for, it can be argued that we have no right at all to do nothing. We need to insist on the reshaping of our political and landscape. Will you help?

Help us fight for the 100 Days – Claiming Back New Zealand movement!

© Amy Brooke, Convener. See my book “100 Days – Claiming Back New Zealand …what has gone wrong, and how we can control our politicians.” Available through Kindle, www.copypress.co.nz or HATM Publishers.

It helps a lot to SHARE or LIKE us through the social media network!
Do help us to get our message further out by donating. See www.100days.co.nz!

 

 

 

 

 

Transgender politics. Mad, bad or deluded? And we have no say? Okay with you?

Transgender politics. Mad, bad or deluded?  And we have no say?  Okay with you?

See below “A tale of tragic, preventable regret”.

Gay “rights”? Racial superiority and preference? Is our “tolerance” for the anti-democratic and socially (let alone morally)  destabilising issues now being forced on New Zealanders basically an intellectual cop-out? http://www.newsweekly.com.au/article.php?id=57377

Or is one reason for the hesitancy or confusion many New Zealanders feel –  deluged by constant political propaganda from the now strident LGBT  (lesbian, gay bisexual, transgender) power groups –  because we personally know fine individuals who, while not indulging in the showmanship of “coming out”  would not define themselves as heterosexual? Whatever happened to them along the way to direct them towards a preference for those of their same-sex is not our business. What is our business is when promotion of gay “ rights” are promoted as in some way heroic, superior to the mother-father role in safeguarding of children – or when the glorification of sexual promiscuity in any form threatens the stability of our society. This is especially so, now the war upon the West has escalated to the recruiting of vulnerable children – which basically equates to corruption.

Moreover, very much to their credit, from some among those who regard themselves as homosexual or lesbian has also come strong condemnation of the escalating political activism bending the ear of weak, vote-seeking politicians. As with the absurdity of gay “marriage”,  it is resulting in ill-thought, radicalised laws being inflicted upon this country by those have now become our political rulers.

Too bad that in a democracy there should be no rulers – that government should be by the people and for the people – as the Swiss have so successfully achieved, making their country the most truly democratic  and successful of all. That we now need to claim the same provision for ourselves – (see www. 100days.co.nz) – the right to put a stop to political deal-making – to demand from our politicians just this – government by the people, including the observance of due process – is more than obvious. The three year election provision does not guarantee us democratic rights and practices – it simply gives us the usual, long overdue opportunity to throw out the political party which has caused so much damage in its term of office – and to exchange it for another which ends up doing the same thing – inflicting on the country legislation which has absolutely no mandate from New Zealanders.

As with all liberal issues of the day which are causing divisiveness right throughout New Zealand society – for example, the National Party’s promotion of racial separatism and preference, with the over-ruling of democratic rights in local government issues  – we can count on things getting worse.  It’s simply a fact that strong minority groups can always contrive a façade of majority acquiescence  –  with the tools of group-think  – and they will win the day, particularly with the help of our predominantly left-wing media  – if they don’t encounter sufficient opposition.

It’s also simply a fact that adult New Zealanders who could, but don’t speak up to be counted… who in fact do absolutely nothing to help turn back the tide of government creep – the targeting of our children; the attack on parents’ and individuals’ rights; the promotion of identity politics favouring ethnic minorities; the blatant intrusion of privacy – now deserve what’s happening.  How many are too lazy to keep themselves well informed, to contact individual MPs when parliament is being pressured on radical issues? How many ring up talkback radio – or write a letter to the paper – or insist in some way that the value of the society we live in is being constantly undermined – and ask why we’re having legislation forced on us without any genuine consultation?

How many realise, for example, under the copy-cat legislation originating in the US, you are now referred to the police for investigation if you deposit $10,000 in a bank account? Perhaps you have just sold your car? Ostensibly targeting target money-laundering has given our government – and the IRD – a wonderful increased opportunity to snoop on citizens – even when a $10,000 (no, not a $100,000 or even $1,000,000) sum is obviously hardly the sign of flagrant political corruption. And whatever happened to the principle that no law should ever be passed which is not absolutely necessary?

What about the growing proliferation of speed cameras once reluctantly accepted because of the publicising of where they were actually located –  to deter dangerous speeding? Now they are being erected without their location being revealed to the public – and with the capacity to more accurately identify a car’s occupants? Reasonable? Or ominous to think a citizen can now be tracked when travelling the length of New Zealand… We are fast having more and more government control forced on us.

Unthinking, over-burdened or mentally and morally lazy individuals are the ones governments count on when constantly increasing the burden of legislation, compliance issues, mounting stress – and in real terms – adding to the lack of hope so many now feel contemplating the kind of future which would have rightly shocked previous generations. No wonder our suicide rate is so high.

But it is the passivity in the face of the threats our children increasingly now encounter for which we are going to be most answerable. What we do, or don’t do, for the little ones… And one of the most destructive attacks now being mounted on them, particularly through the destabilising, biologically and morally perverse sex education programmes now being forced upon the schools (and aided by many now activist teachers – themselves lesbian or gay) is the transgender, choose your own sex “option” – achieving cult proportions. * From the excellent Australian News Weekly, essential reading in relation to what is actually happening in our part of the world (particularly given the fact that we now have in this country no in-depth, quality journal) comes this article, both timely and shocking in its revelations.

From our initial link- see “A tale of tragic, preventable regret”

“Recently I received an email that blows the lid off the idea of sex-change success and illustrates the truth about damaged lives. This man’s story of transition started in his teens.

“He explains: “I transitioned to female, beginning in my late teens and changed my name in my early 20s, over 10 years ago. But it wasn’t right for me; I feel only discontent now in the female role. I was told that my transgender feelings were permanent, immutable, physically deep-seated in my brain and could never change, and that the only way I would ever find peace was to become female.

“The problem is, I don’t have those feelings any more. When I began seeing a psychologist a few years ago to help overcome some childhood trauma issues, my depression and anxiety began to wane but so did my transgender feelings. So two years ago I began contemplating going back to my birth gender, and it feels right to do so. I have no doubts – I want to be male!”

And what about – “A staggering 41 per cent of people who identify as transgender reported in a national survey that they had attempted suicide. That’s over 25 times the rate of suicide attempts (1.6 per cent) among the general population. Clearly, this is a group at high risk for dangerous levels of depression – and, as the work of Dr Ihlenfeld attests, sex-change surgery is not the way to help keep them safe.”

The US is even further down the path of cultural bullying, of intimidating all opposition and of spreading the moral and intellectual confusion which now repudiates the reality of the truth of issues. Furthermore, so well has this generation of university students been thoroughly brainwashed on their way through our supposedly intellectual institutions, that the refusal to entertain any other point of view than their own has become a source for scandal, nationwide. #

“We now reject every constraint on our own so-called right to radical self-determination, even if those constraints are biology and reality. That is why a full-grown man can decide to leave his family and live as a six-year-old girl, and the media coverage of this is largely subdued and respectful. That is why there is a new group of human beings who identify as non-human beings—rather, they are “Otherkin,” people who identify as certain animals. This is treated with long-faced solemnity by our cultural elites, because truth is dead and people can be whatever they want, even if they are obviously not what or who they say they are.

*For those who are baffled by each new absurdity, there is an extensive arsenal of labels awaiting them. Homophobe. Transphobe…Otherkinphobe? And so it goes.

As far as our culture is concerned, God is dead, and so is truth. An institution no less respected than TIME Magazine announced their respective departures from the culture. But I can’t help but think of the origin of the phrase “God is dead.” It came from the nihilist philosopher Friedrich Nietszche, in his parable “The Madman,” where he wondered with appropriate panic, where morality would come from once God left.

#  https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/dear-time-if-truth-is-dead-its-because-you-killed-it-not-trump?–

In the media’s war against Trump, the ignoring  of  the safeguards he is implementing against the bullying of the “liberal” left, to roll back the climate of oppression and intimidation that is now weighing on the  US, is suppressed in our own shockingly  unobjective media. It is notable that apparently most of our well funded mainstream newspapers and national broadcasting have taken on board the fact that the majority of the public does not agree with their at times near-rabid editorials and notably biased columnists. The comments sections are disappearing. The media do not want to hear dissent – the anonymous editorialists and well-entrenched commentators want the field to themselves – hence the withholding of letters to the editor which challenge media bias – or the inadequacy of editorial thinking.

And those who think the sheer madness of the transgender movement now sweeping throughout the West is not happening in this country are themselves deluded. It’s well under way. The NZ government is now funding  problematic sex-change operations (have taxpayers okayed this?) and, given our government’s willingness to constantly cave into radical pressure, things are going to get worse. Already, without any opt-out option,  New Zealanders who object in conscience to their taxpayer dollars being used to put to death unborn children have no say whatever. So much for democracy and the rule of conscience – so fundamental to recognising the rights of every individual – both born and not yet born.

http://dailysignal.com/2017/02/02/mr-president-dont-cave-to-liberal-fearmongering-protect-religious-freedom/

As the brilliant G K Chesterton warned us,  “A tired democracy becomes a dictatorship.” We’re well on the way – and only enough New Zealanders now demanding our country back, challenging the unholy alliance of government with political and moneyed power groups, will save us.

The only movement with any real opportunity for achieving this challenge is ours – favouring no political party, no end of the political spectrum – simply emphasising the worth of every individual, irrespective of colour, gender race or creed – and insisting on the respect due to a genuine democracy… the right of the people of our country to control our politicians – not to be controlled by them.

Help us fight for the 100 Days – Claiming back New Zealand movement!

© Amy Brooke, Convener. See my book “100 Days – Claiming Back New Zealand …what has gone wrong, and how we can control our politicians.” Available through Kindle, www.copypress.co.nz or HATM Publishers.

It helps a lot to SHARE or LIKE us through the social media network!
Do help us to get our message further out by donating. See www.100days.co.nz!

 

 

The war against children now here-Barack Obama’s legacy ?

The war against children -Barack Obama’s real legacy now happening here.

https://billmuehlenberg.com/2016/05/18/trans-blitzkrieg-coming-soon-home-church-school-near/

The rot spread by the liberal left, the cultural war of those neo-Marxists entrenched within our own New Zealand Ministry of Education, laying down policy and forcing damaging compliance issues on our schools, has been very much helped by the twisted values espoused by Barack Obama, probably the most un-American of any president in history. Some of his appalling stances,  as in his administration’s attack  on the Little Sisters of the Poor, or his and Hillary’s enthusiasm for partial birth abortion (killing a full term baby by removing its brains as it emerges from the birth canal) hint at a individual  for whom the distinction between good and evil has been lost. And now, the attack on family values, on children, is gathering in force with the mounting wave of transgender issues. That we should even be allowing our school policies of sex education to be largely determined by the appalling Family Planning Association, with its now documented buying and selling of aborted babies’ parts for profits, is indicative of the Left’s footprint on our education policy. And now it is going to get worse for our children.

In spite of all the Beautiful People backing her – the Hollywood celebrities in whose eyes the dreadful Clintons could do no wrong – (certainly not the proven liar, Hillary, very much half of the corrupt pair about whom the disillusioned Democrat, Christopher Hitchens, wrote so tellingly in his scathing indictment of the Clinton partnership “Nobody Left to Lie To”) – the American people have spoken. Unthinkably, it has been Donald Trump, in spite of all his boasting, his formerly chauvinistic attitude to women, and all the other questions concerning his involvement in various undertakings during his career, whom the people elected as President.

Shock, horror? Hmm?

A now thoroughly partisan media, with apparently no more belief in democracy than many politicians, left-wing radical activists, hysterical women, and the equally hysterical “right thinkers” among their feminised men, has apparently now been joined by wealthy vested interests in their quite shocking attempt to destabilise the Trump administration. But the American people have spoken. And as the new era settles in, and Trump’s decisions are increasingly supported nationwide – in spite of the  quasi-elite from among the media, the Hollywood stars, the pop singers who always know so much better than the mere “ordinary people”… the Obama legacy is going to be seen as destructive as it has.

But the damage has been done – and the attack on normalcy – on free speech – on those Christian values which have basically been the ones long stabilising the West, will continue.  Moreover, our only chance of limiting the damage already taking place in this country is if individuals stop leaving it to others to speak out –and  realise the moral burden placed on each of us to stand up for what is right –  or else to be answerable for the consequences of not doing so.

The biggest lesson many of us need to take on board is that it is individuals who count… It is individuals who can successfully challenge the political Establishment – to join that worldwide movement of those determined to claim back their own country – as so successfully has happened in England, with Brexit.

New Zealand’s own movement  to stop the political abuse of power, is contained in  www.100days.co.nz – the 100 Days – Claiming Back New Zealand, detailing what has gone wrong and how we can control our politicians. Will you join us?

©  Amy Brooke, Convener, The 100 Days.

 

 

Waitangi Day – Morgan, Peters – the real treaty.

 

 Waitangi Day – Morgan, Peters – the real treaty.

An e-mail sent this Waitangi to the editor of a provincial paper highlights a worldwide problem, the sheer bias, and even incompetence of too many journalists. On days like today, when “cultural cringe” is tediously invoked by so many commentators culpably misrepresenting our joint past, it is those fighting back who represent real New Zealanders. We should applaud them: For example :  Dear Editor,

“I suggest that your readers cannot take seriously Philip Mathews’ article (Times, 4/2/17), supposedly about Gareth Morgan, when he states that Winston Peters espouses “divisive Don Brash-like views about the Treaty of Waitangi.”  This grossly perverts Brash’s position and probably Peters’ too.  What Brash actually said at Orewa in 2004 was “The Treaty of Waitangi should not be used as the basis for giving greater civil, political or democratic rights to any [his italics] particular ethnic group.”  His current “Hobson’s Pledge” campaign is founded on Hobson’s words at Waitangi “He iwi Tahi tatou”- “We are one people now”.

 Divisive?  Mathews should get his facts right, and not claim their direct opposite before he rushes into print.” It’s signed by Bruce Moon, a highly respected historian on Treaty issues.

What has struck me over the years as disgraceful is that those editorialists who rant against the Orewa speech have apparently not even read it. No wonder that public respect for the mass media is pretty well much at an all-time low – as shown by the fact that journalists now figure pretty much at the bottom of all occupations surveyed.

A rational reader could not possibly take exception to this statement. “The Treaty of Waitangi should not be used as the basis for giving greater civil, political or democratic rights to any [his italics] particular ethnic group.”  Moreover, it is quite obvious that the original intent of the treaty was to achieve a genuine democracy – where all New Zealanders had equal rights under the law. The deliberate twisting of its intent has been by radical activists (hand in hand with the wet liberal Left)  making the ridiculous claim that the treaty is “a living document” – meaning that they want to claim it promised special rights, special privileges, exclusively to those of Maori descent.

We can expect this from those on the make, embarrassing even their own people by the extent to which greed and egoism – and the need to constantly  centre-stage for media attention – are driving factors in the way they peddle grievances as a result of non-existent victimhood.

However, those media commentators who willingly oblige them are equally culpable – and it is not just in this country. As a recent Spectator article has pointed out  … ‘We have witnessed the death of independent,  evidence-based journalism. Somewhere in the last 20 years, journalists stopped being  recorders of events and became cultural and moral arbiters. “ Determined to impose their own highly politicised view of the world upon others …”they became narcissistically unaware of life outside their occupational echo-chamber and obsessed with identity politics.” Objective reporting of events has been replaced by “ advocacy journalism,” which is code for brazen political barracking.

“The Trump phenomenon, for example, has not caused a crisis in global democracy.  Rather at home and abroad, its greatest impact has been to expose the crisis in the credibility of the political, media and foreign policy elites.”

And the media can be accused of complicity in the attack on democracy now taking place in the US where the American Left has refused to accept the outcome of the 2016 presidential election.   Determined to attack Donald Trump’s legitimacy, it’s called a series of mass demonstrations against the president – demonstrations well-funded – and with left-wing filmmaker Michael Moore calling on his followers to turn up in Washington to disrupt the inauguration. “The organisation came to block all the major roads into Washington DC promising to make traffic a nightmare, and also to stop trains heading into the city. They also intended to prevent people from attending by crowding around checkpoints leading to events.

“Naturally, fellow travellers in the media were delighted to accommodate them…. The whole campaign is not only unprecedented; it is profoundly undemocratic and in fact authoritarian. By trying to make the country ungovernable the Left is demonstrating its contempt for democracy and its determination to impose its will on the American people.” News Weekly, January 28, 2027.

The same thing is happening in New Zealand with the constant disparagement of New Zealand First’s policies and the contempt the media quite openly show for Winston Peters’ “largely grey-haired” audiences.

Labour has now shot itself in the foot by bringing a highly radicalised Willie Jackson on board and allying itself with the Greens. With their usual unfortunately extremist tactics, this party wants to compel all schoolchildren to have inflicted on them a thoroughly inauthentic, 90% reinvented “Maori” language – bearing minimal relationship to the language actually spoken by Maori – a striking case of cultural bullying.

It is only New Zealand First which, to the obvious annoyance of the mass media constantly demonising Peter’s prescient warnings about the quite wrong directions in which both major political parties have been taking us, represents the feeling of those who do not belong within the media’s self-serving echo chambers.

© Amy Brooke, Convener. See my book “100 Days – Claiming Back New Zealand …what has gone wrong, and how we can control our politicians.” Available through Kindle, www.copypress.co.nz or HATM Publishers.

It helps a lot to SHARE or LIKE us through the social media network!

 

The government’s now promoting damaging identity politics

Identity politics…while we’re deliberately being kept out of the decision-making?

Is this all right with you – although we are supposed to be a democracy? If not, why are you putting up with what our politicians are doing to New Zealand?

And does this serve us right?  – especially when your rallying to support our vital 100 Days – Claiming Back New Zealand movement would put a stop to this sell-out of this country…as we are being more and more put under the thumb of powerful and politicised interest groups. And by no means does this exclude wealthy iwi pushing for more and more self-advantage –  at the expense of the rest of the country.

What about this for manipulative gobbledy-gook?

http://www.canterbury.ac.nz/capitalworks/planning/cultural-narrative.shtml

http://maori.otago.ac.nz/local-tribal-authority

Mana whenua refers to the mana held by local people who have ‘demonstrated authority’ over land or territory in a particular area, authority which is derived through whakapapa links to that area. While tangata whenua refers to ‘people of the land’, our indigenous people (ngā iwi Māori), mana whenua refers to the people who have local tribal or sub-tribal authority.”

“Demonstrating authority over a particular area” ?

Ah, the sheer manipulative mumbo-jumbo. First, none of us were indigenous to New Zealand. Both Maori and European arrived here from elsewhere. Moreover, early Maori used the term “tangata whenua” specifically to refer to others whom they were well aware had arrived before them –it meant not  themselves, but “the first people…” those who had lived here before, as our early European historians recorded.

More ominously for what is left of one of the most important principles of democracy, equality of all before the law, the fact that the Maori economy is now worth $40 billion – yes billion dollars, means that local powerful iwi are now buying influence – as we see above. For example, the promise of the Trojan gift horses of iwi funding has become too much for university management to resist.

Shamefully, at the University of Canterbury alone, heads of departments are now being pressured to incorporate special,  supposedly superior Maori cultural viewpoints into totally irrelevant study courses, with the prospect of degrees no longer being issued unless students sign up to these.  I recall one particular graduation ceremony alone, where I was shocked to hear the guest speaker, a highly placed member of the powerful Ngai Tahu corporation,  take advantage of this academic celebration to launch an utterly inappropriate,  politicised tirade against the views of a politician with whom he disagreed – but which had nothing whatever to do with the university, or with the ceremony at hand. Not one faculty member sitting on stage did as he or she should have – walked out. The universities have in fact sold out.

By far the majority of New Zealanders know that we are no longer the country we were once. So it’s time we squarely faced up to the major threats New Zealand is now facing – internal as well as external.  And what about this disgraceful state of affairs – the now direct attack on our once much healthier democracy? With respect to George Orwell, what about the hijacking of the country with the now blatant :  “All cultures are equal, but some cultures are more equal than others …”?

The pressure of wealthy iwi corporations has long led to vote-buying – in an unholy alliance with the would-be dictatorship of a feel-good, think bad, mainstream media.  It’s become more obvious than ever that our self-regarding commentariat are overdue to take a reality check. They are still failing to face the fact that the public have become deeply hostile to being told what to think by ignorant or brain-washed, condescending editorialist and commentators. The lessons from both Brexit and the Trump victory over what is now viewed as an entrenched political and media establishment, too often hand in glove, have certainly not sunk home in this country.

Ominously, unless we begin with urgency to do something about it, the period now being called post-democracy is going to bed in. It’s increasingly  characterised by the fact that the majority which holds traditional and  stabilizing conservative views is going to be more and more under attack, disparagingly referred to as “populist” – or, scandalously, with even more contempt, as “Christian”… by powerful  radicalised groups using terms of intimidation such as racist, homophobic, etc.   Characterised by their aggression, intolerance, and often sheer nastiness they not only try to intimidate those justifiably worried  about what is happening to our society, its growing fragmentation and the confusion and inappropriate sexualisation of our young – they even use the bludgeon  of threatening court action when they find it useful to claim they have been “offended”.  Worse, activist judges also find it useful to rule in their favour. Post-democracy, indeed.

The manipulative bleating about ” the tyranny of the majority” –  now also coming from those who have already been very much part of the damage caused to this country by promoting unhealthy separatist polices, for example – is a quite blatant  attack against the time-tested principle of  democracy – equality for all under the law. This nonsense of “the tyranny of the majority” is being deliberately used to try to disguise the fact that what we are now experiencing is the tyranny of the minority– i.e. ethnic bullying – but not by any means by the majority of part-Maori. And we all know that all those claiming to be Maori in this country are now only part-Maori,  many having a far more predominant genetic influence inherited from their European or other forebears – which they find convenient to ignore. It gets them none of the special advantages they can tap into by claiming disadvantage.

This claim has become farcical considering that very astute, if equally greedy corporate iwi executives can now commonly have only 1/8,  1/16 or 1/32 worth of Maori “disadvantage”.  In fact it can be regarded as essentially an insult to their own ancestors to claim that having a Maori genetic inheritance disadvantages them. On the contrary, given the many thousands of Maoris slaughtered by other Maoris during the musket wars, miscalled the land wars, it could well be argued that according to the laws of Darwinism the survival of the fittest meant that today’s part-Maori have a special advantage – smarter and/or luckier ancestors.

 Among those most vociferously complaining are wealthy individuals  – by no means representative of the now thousands of New Zealanders of part-Maori descent who are not interested in playing the race card of identity politics – but who have made for themselves worthwhile careers as doctors, nurses, dentists  -and other professionals. Many have long travelled the world. Others have worked to achieve well-deserved and worthwhile qualifications in the trades and industry. Only in the legal, judicial area is the landscape greyer. Here, so many hundreds of iwi-funded  lawyers were sent to law school with the prime aim of representing a particular pseudo-tribal group – in order to  prioritise more and more ways of taking advantage of “reinterpreting” the Treaty of Waitangi according to the radicalised “living document” nonsense so conveniently advanced for particular benefit.

What genetic disadvantage can there be in descending from a clever people? Moreover the contradiction is considerable, given that these same spokespersons also claim special advantage, special perceptions, special insights denied every other ethnic group when it comes to demanding separatist representation on local councils – and other supposedly democratic bodies throughout the country.

We’re at the socially divisive stage in this country where powerful interest groups with the ear of government are using non-accountable institutions to influence, challenge or overturn majority decisions – as for example,   the extraordinary attempts by this National government to force local bodies to supply special undemocratic voting rights to unelected part-Maori on  local body councils. This, while ignoring the fact that in at least 14 polls challenging this government’s virtual bullying, every single poll carried one message:  NO to special rights, a special voice for those of part-Maori descent.  The percentages range down from an 87%  NO to any special voice on councils in the Rotorua poll; 85% NO to the Bay of Plenty; 83% to New Plymouth -and so on. Nearly all the NO percentages are in the very highest range – the lower 52% NO to Maori wards in Wairoa, with the population of 46% Maori being the highest of all – but still a significant one. The useful site, Kiwifrontline, has highlighted this and other issues which involve blatant racism.

In the view of many, the influence of the prematurely departed Prime Minister who has now disembarked from what many are concerned is a sinking ship has been malign – with this county being well and truly sold out along the line…not simply in relation to the abuse of racial privilege. In other important areas to be covered in future journal entries, John Key has left New Zealand in a far worse state than when he came to power. An over-authoritarian politician, Key wielded his power over a sycophantic cabinet which basically jumped to do his bidding. As Nick Smith famously explained: his personal choice was to ask – How high? when his party leader told him to jump.

It’s past time for more NZErs to wake up to the fact that our politicians have long been causing considerable damage to the country. And they will be no help at all to us with regard to the new radicalised, but smooth-talking attempt to entrench a basically activist and damaging constitution for Aotearoa (the radicalised name a giveaway in itself). This proposed, oh-so-necessary move is also basically designed to assist iwi to have special racist rights over the rest of the country.

 Like rust, those plotting away behind the scenes – (and using Lenin’s well-meaning “useful fools” from among our lawyers and bureaucrats) never sleep… Why for example, are our new banknotes headed Aotearoa New Zealand – which is certainly not New Zealand’s official name – and never was? However, Aotearoa is increasingly used as part of a radicalised attempt to prioritise the Maori language as having more “authenticity” than English – which is demonstrably untrue – but taken up by feel-good NZers with no idea of the issues at stake.

In fact, right throughout all our institutions, a now thoroughly inauthentic “Maori” is being forced on those working there – including in our schools (as well as the universities) where one by one good teachers are resigning, over-whelmed by the proliferation of never-ending compliance issues forced on them by the well and truly radicalised Ministry of Education. Many not only thoroughly disagree with these, but find it now impossible to get worthwhile, genuine teaching time. Moreover, the basic dishonesty of claiming that the now many thousands of newly invented Maori words being forced upon the country as authentic Maori needs to be challenged – (its relation to the previously genuine spoken Maori is  minimal) –  as does the thoroughly politicised move to trap young part-Maori into segregated te reo schools. These serve the purpose of radicalised iwi, anxious to increase tribal adherence, but cheat these children, too, of anything approaching a quality education.

What of the economic as well as the social costs to the country?

It’s not simply that the health budget for example, cannot afford to be increased, in spite of growing demands, and the shocking squeeze on even the most basic of procedures so many are now waiting for. The government’s wrong priorities have been part of this increasing clampdown on essential services, not only by keeping the hospitals cash-strapped, but by actually trying to reduce funding in such important areas as mental health services, drug rehabilitation, and taking care of genuinely disadvantaged young New Zealanders. The misallocation of resources directed towards Maori-only interests has long siphoned urgently-needed funding from areas of now critical need.

 The National Party in particular has been prioritising  Maori-only interests for decades now to satisfy the demands of the manipulative pseudo-tribal  executives who expect ministers to give them special audience, and who well know how to pressure government with the lure of the supposed (but non-existent)  Maori vote. And although the Maori economy is now worth $40 billion, yet activist part-Maori con us by continuing to claiming a non-existent disadvantage, constantly and successfully clamouring for more and more prioritising over their fellow countrymen – which can well be regarded as scandalous in itself. Even more so is the fact of the government continually caving in to such pressure.

There is no justification whatever for the  $36 million planned to be taken from taxpayers over the next three years to keep promoting a language that is now far from genuine Maori. (e.g. What about: The Ministry of Economic development…Department of Social  Welfare…Accident and Rehabilitation Services.. Inland Revenue Department…St Johns Ambulance…  direct flights on Emirates to the UK?  Utterly fake “Maori” equivalents have now been invented for everything – but they are all made-up and it is sheer nonsense to claim them as belonging to the real Maori language. So why is this happening?

Right across the spectrum of everyday terms…buses, cars, bicycles …hokey pokey icecream…coffee and tea… university extension courses…computer courses…warm woollen socks…by far the scores of thousands of words deliberately coined to be launched upon New Zealand as needing to be taken up and foisted off on us all, and particularly on children in schools as “Maori”,   are nothing of the sort. While all languages gradually assimilate new words, there is nothing at all authentic about these that have been  simply been invented, to fit a politicised agenda.

The wealthy Maori economy itself is well able to afford to look after those of Maori descent who remain genuinely disadvantaged. Yet the ongoing process is to keep extorting money from taxpayers. Why, for example, the public funding of specifically Maori television? All similar provisions are basically demanded by and directed towards those particular elites who primarily profit from the constant raiding of taxpayers’ pockets – including those whose salaries are derived from presiding over this separatist funding.

This misallocation of resources brought about by the unholy alliance between the vote-buying government and those claiming prior rights is  costing us – in more ways than one, and fair-minded New Zealanders, by no means averse to trying to tackle genuine injustices from the past, have become fed up. There is increasing awareness that there is no valid reason for taxpayers to be compelled to keep having to prioritise minority interests – because of racist claims of special identity. As the American actor Morgan Freeman recently advocated – we could solve the race problem by not talking about it…. by stopping talking about it. We would return to a more much vibrant, healthier society.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3cGfrExozQ&app=desktop.

Moreover, for worthwhile reading on this topic, and a challenge to the distortions of facts about our joint past, it is worthwhile accessing the invaluable Truss Publishing – http://trosspublishing.co.nz/ for the well-researched books  – Twisting the Treaty –  and  One Treaty, One Nation for important correctives to the distortions, fabrications and outright lies concerning our past history  – inciting a resentment and antagonism which ill-serves a country with the once far healthier aim of being One People, and a cohesive, well-integrated society far better positioned to face the now growing threat to our New Zealand from outside our shores.

Those aware that the hour is late, and who realize that our political parties has become very much part of the damage caused to this country can take heart from our 100 Days – Claiming Back New Zealand movement   – www. 100days.co.nz . We offer the only real, practical and very much attainable opportunity to follow the path shown to us by the most successful and  democratic country of the world.

 Switzerland has shown us the lesson of the 100 Days. All we now need is enough New Zealanders to support us – quite simpl,y individuals on board to be counted – and we will achieve that tipping point to make it politically possible. But it takes each of us. Those who do nothing, as so often, should regard themselves as very much part of the problem.

 Are you?

It is now so very easy to take steps to be heard.

Support our 100 Days – www.100days.co.nz- to win back this country for New Zealanders – and tell everybody!

 Why not ring an MPs’s office? Tell him or her you expect the same commitment – so that we New Zealanders – not politicised  interest groups –  will now be the ones to make the important decisions about our future directions.

Why not email your MP, political parties, party leaders? Every contact counts.

If you disagree with damaging government policy, are you stating that you expect your views to be taken into account?

Why not write a letter to the editor (even biased editors have to at least read these).

Why not ring talkback… talk with family, friends or colleagues?

It can take moral courage for many to now stand up to be counted. But as we have been reminded: The greatest works are done by the ones. The hundreds do not often do much – the companies never; it is the units  – the single individuals that are the power and the might.  Individual effort is, after all, the grand thing.” 

©  Amy Brooke

Amy Brooke, Convener. See my book “100 Days – Claiming Back New Zealand …what has gone wrong, and how we can control our politicians.” Available through Kindle, www.copypress.co.nz or HATM Publishers.

It helps a lot to SHARE or LIKE us through the social media network!

See Facebook https://www.facebook.com/100daystodemocracy?ref=br_tf