Nelson Mayor’s abysmally un-critical embracing….

Check out this photo: Nelson Mayor’s abysmally un-critical embracing of this destructive, anarchistic and anti-Western group.

Nelson Mayor Rachel Reese hugged emotional members of Extinction Rebellion after the council voted to declare climate change an emergency.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/environment/climate-news/112774585/nelson-declares-climate-emergency

 See where  Stuart Basden, one of the founders of Extinction Rebellion whose members Mayor Rachel Reese so very foolishly recently embraced, set out its manifesto below…And it is those advocating his agenda whom Mayor Rachel Reese is supporting…Why?
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/white-collar-eco-warriors-to-spread-chaos-swl273xdh   ***

This is what Nelson’s foolish Mayor and councillors have shockingly endorsed – The Marxist Extinction Rebellion group – now costing us all in yet more rises in rates – and loss of credibility. And almost incredibly,  Nelsonians now have to pay for an extremely highly paid individual “to manage climate change”.

Really? How? And all because of the sheer nonsense that we are facing a climate change “emergency”.

This arrogant move is being noted as a  huge departure from council’s annual plan and long-term plan. Without any public consultation, it involves raiding the port dividend.

Stuart Basden, 35, from Bristol, a co-founder {of Extinction Rebellion} was convicted of unlawful protests in May last year for blocking a tunnel into Heathrow by attaching himself to cars. he told the training day: ” By shutting down the streets we will force the government to negotiate with us, and hopefully they will cave in to our demands.”

As a reader comments: “Extinction rebellion really are the same old (censored) – but now mobilising the educated youth into nascent Green versions of the Red Guards.)

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/04/02/the-new-green-threat-extinction-rebellion/

“The plan is to replace the ”criminal” western political systems with a ”better democracy” designed by Extinction Rebellion in which e.g. voting is no longer needed (sortition is preferred instead). The practical post-revolution steps have also been thought out well in advance.”  ***

Extinction Rebellion isn’t about the climate. It’s about toppling Western governments. Fine by you, Rachel?

The gullibility of the  climate change cultists, including Jacinda  Ardern’s government  – seizing on yet more opportunities to tax us – let alone the shocking censorship by STUFF  – is costing us all.

The sheer folly of all this is obvious in the fact that even if New Zealand – and even both New Zealand and Australia!  – reduced every single CO2 emission –  it is acknowledged it wouldn’t make one peck of  difference to Earth’s climate.

So why all the hysteria? And what a massive con is being inflicted on us all. ..

Hats off to the councils which have refused this “climate change emergency” nonsense.

Apparently, no provision was made for any well-informed Nelsonians to debate or oppose the issue  when this costly decision was inflicted upon the Nelson public. Equally as culpably,  I understand one one councillor  quite shockingly turned off the microphone of a very experienced member of the public  – to prevent his being heard!

We need to vote them out at the next election.

***” I use the term ‘insanity’ carefully, with the intention of highlighting the need for healing. Indigenous First Nation people helpfully taught me to see the mindset of the coloniser as a sickness. In no way do I intend to marginalise or discredit the experience of people who have been labelled ‘insane’ by a normative system, nor who identify as being ‘insane’.

** “Climate Justice refers to the injustice that those who are affected first and worst by extreme weather events (the people in the poorer countries, the majority of whom live in the Global South) are not likely to be the ones who caused the climate emissions (the people who consume the most, including the pathologically wasteful cultures of Europe and Turtle Island (aka North America), and the rich who live/travel around the world).”Stuart Basden

Time to think again, councillors…

Amy Brooke, Convenor, The 100 Days.  See my book “100 Days – Claiming Back New Zealand …what has gone wrong, and how we can control our politicians.” Available through my  BOOK Page at www.amybrooke.co.nz, or at Amazon’s Kindle.

Is Facebook interfering again?

Can the reaction to the Gossnell film can be regarded as a victory against the very truth of what happens in abortion?  https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/facebook-blocks-gosnell-ads-labels-film-about-serial-killer-abortionist-pol

Gosnell: The Trial of America’s Biggest Serial Killer is currently playing in theatres nationwide, but one of the film’s producers says that Facebook is doing its part to keep Americans from knowing about it. Why?

Was the great Times columnist, Bernard Levin right or wrong when he said,  “the atrophy of moral judgment is the characteristic disease of our times – the inability to see evil and a willingness to condone it”? 

Is there in fact a great badness underpinning the attack on the truth of what happens in abortion? Is our own Prime Minister dodging this, in her wish to “liberalise” the law?

Why do so many American women – and women elsewhere  – they  who know the reality of a dependent little life growing inside them –  so very desperately repudiate  what is actually true? Why do they fight against taking on board the fact that much more is involved than the highly specious mantra of “a woman’s right to her own body”?

It’s not her own body she’s having killed, is it…

So what about the fudging of the fact that the deliberate killing of a boy or girl child instead is what actually happens?

What if it is no accident that we have progressed – or rather – regressed – to the point where people have become embarrassed about actually using their judgment about what is good or  evil – even about the existence of actual forces of good and evil – because it is now unfashionable to do so? 

Has “evil” simply become an embarrassing word?

But what if there is both good and evil in the world and we are constantly faced with choices between these?  And what if these choices carry consequences?

What is the effect on us – and on our society – if we just don’t want to know – if we pretend it doesn’t matter whether or not we actually try to get to the truth of issues – rather than simply justify to ourselves and others the choices that are “more convenient”, more palatable?

But what if to be human carries an obligation that we must evaluate what we’re doing – what we support and what we don’t support?

What if we are expected to think with our heads as well as our hearts – to make moral choices – to even think about the meaning of the word moral?

What if it is time to stop ignoring or glossing over the damage this dreadful practice has done to so many women, victims of a massive con – many in pain for the rest of their lives… let alone the dead babies resulting?

Is part of the problem with Western civilisation today that basically, individuals have been long propagandised against the necessity for moral and spiritual and spiritual choices in our lives?

What if it is actually true that …”Our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.” Ephesians. 

Is it time we faced up to being far less conflicted about talking about  the very real possibility of moral and spiritual evil  – and of the act of abortion being very much part of this? 

And shouldn’t we wonder why those who legitimately raise these issues are subjected to such vilification and abuse?

 © Amy Brooke